首页> 外文OA文献 >Thermospheric Dynamics During September 18-19, 1984, 2, Validation of the NCAR Thermospheric General Circulation Model
【2h】

Thermospheric Dynamics During September 18-19, 1984, 2, Validation of the NCAR Thermospheric General Circulation Model

机译:1984年9月18日至19日的热圈动力学,NCAR热圈总循环模型的验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The validation of complex nonlinear numerical models such as the National Center for Atmospheric Research thermospheric general circulation model (NCAR TGCM) requires a detailed comparison of model predictions with data. The Equinox Transition Study (ETS) of September 17-24, 1984, provided a unique opportunity to address the verification of the NCAR TGCM, since unusually large quantities of high-quality thermospheric and ionospheric data were obtained during an intensive observation interval. In a companion paper (paper 1) by Crowley et al. (this issue) a simulation of the September 18-19 ETS interval was described. Using a novel approach to modeling, the TGCM inputs were tuned where possible with guidance from data describing the appropriate input fields, and the arbitrary adjustment of input variables in order to obtain thermospheric predictions which match measurements was avoided. In the present paper the winds, temperatures, and densities predicted by the TGCM are compared with measurements from the ETS interval. In many respects, agreement between the predictions and observations is good. The quiet day observations contain a strong semidiurnal wind variation which is mainly due to upward propagating tides. The storm day wind behavior is significantly different and includes a surge of equatorward winds due to a global propagating disturbance associated with the storm onset. The density data confirm the existence of the newly discovered four-cell high-latitude density anomaly described in paper 1. A quantitative statistical comparison of the predicted and measured winds indicates that the equatorward winds in the model are weaker than the observed winds, particularly during storm times. This is consistent with predicted latitudinal temperature gradients and storm time density increases which are much smaller than the observed values. Soft particle precipitation or high-altitude plasma heating is invoked as a possible source of the additional high-latitude heating required by the model. A quiet day phase anomaly in the measured F region winds which is not reproduced by the model suggests the occurrence of an important unmodeled interaction between upward propagating semidiurnal tides and high-latitude effects. Wind data from altitudes below 100 km indicate shortcomings in the generic equinox solar minimum tidal specification used in the TGCM. The lack of appropriate data to specify input fields seriously impairs our ability to generate realistic global thermospheric simulations. The problem is particularly acute in the southern hemisphere. Furthermore, disturbances generated in the southern hemisphere simulation propagate northward and degrade the northern hemisphere predictions. Thus, if the thermosphere in the northern hemisphere is ever to be fully understood, the southern hemisphere needs to be observed and simulated more accurately. Several improvements are suggested for future realistic time-dependent simulations of specific intervals.
机译:验证复杂的非线性数值模型(例如美国国家大气研究中心热层总循环模型(NCAR TGCM))需要将模型预测与数据进行详细比较。 1984年9月17日至24日的春分转换研究(ETS)为解决NCAR TGCM的验证提供了独特的机会,因为在密集的观测间隔中获得了异常大量的高质量热层和电离层数据。在Crowley等人的同伴论文(论文1)中。 (此问题)描述了9月18日至19日ETS间隔的模拟。使用一种新颖的建模方法,在可能的情况下,通过描述适当输入字段的数据指导,对TGCM输入进行了调整,并避免了对输入变量的任意调整,从而获得了与测量值匹配的热层预测。在本文中,TGCM预测的风,温度和密度与ETS间隔的测量值进行了比较。在许多方面,预测和观察之间的一致性很好。安静的一天观测到的半日风变化很大,这主要是由于潮汐向上传播所致。暴风雨日的风的行为有很大不同,并且由于与暴风雨相关的全球传播干扰而导致赤道风向激增。密度数据证实了论文1中描述的新发现的四单元高纬度密度异常的存在。对预测风和测量风的定量统计比较表明,模型中的赤道风弱于观测到的风,特别是在风暴时间。这与预测的纬度温度梯度和风暴时间密度的增加相一致,风暴的密度比观测值小得多。调用软粒子沉淀或高海拔等离子加热作为模型所需的其他高纬度加热的可能来源。在测得的F区风中,一个安静的白天相位异常没有被模型重现,这表明向上传播的半日潮和高纬度效应之间发生了重要的,未建模的相互作用。来自低于100 km的高度的风数据表明TGCM中使用的普通春分最低潮汐技术指标存在缺陷。缺乏用于指定输入场的适当数据严重损害了我们生成逼真的全球热圈模拟的能力。在南半球,这一问题尤为严重。此外,在南半球模拟中产生的扰动向北传播并降低了北半球的预测。因此,如果要完全了解北半球的热圈,则需要更精确地观察和模拟南半球。建议对未来的特定时间间隔进行逼真的模拟,需要进行一些改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号